Medical Procedures on Shabbat

Dear Rabbi Fried,

I’ve been discussing with Jewish colleagues the traditional view of medical emergencies vis-à-vis the Sabbath, and which takes precedence according to traditional sources. I realize it’s not in the purview of this column to do an exhaustive analysis of this topic, but perhaps you could give a rule of thumb.

Dr. L

Dear Dr. L,

The rule of thumb according to the Torah is that saving a life takes precedence over the Sabbath. This applies even if there is even the slightest doubt that the situation at hand, should it deteriorate, could lead to a danger to life. There are vast treatises that deal with all the intricacies of these laws, beginning with chapters of the classical Code of Jewish Law in the laws of Shabbos and Yom Kippur.

Some opinions hold that the reason life supersedes Shabbat is that it’s preferable to break one Shabbat in order that the person saved should be able to keep many further Shabbats. According to this opinion, if the person is certain to die right after Shabbat, there would be no allowance to break this one for him. The majority opinion, however, which is considered the law, is that life itself supersedes the Shabbat, whether or not the one being saved will ever keep another Shabbat. Even if the person has only minutes left to live we override Shabbat to perform whatever is necessary for his needs to make him comfortable and perhaps give him moments of life. This is because the Torah teaches us that life is so precious it supersedes the fulfillment of mitzvot, including the all-important mitzvah of Shabbos.

A venerable sage, R’ Chaim Soloveitchik, was well known for his stringency in this matter, and  great scholars would be seen leaving his home Friday night, with torch in hand, on a mission from the Rabbi to take care of this or that sick individual. When once challenged about his leniency in the laws of Shabbos, he famously replied that “he is not lenient in the observance of Shabbos, rather he is stringent concerning even the slightest doubt concerning the danger to life.” (Pikuach nefesh). That statement of R’ Chaim shaped the worldview of Jewish law and continues to be the attitude of authorities until today.

We could spend months or even years delving into the intricacies of this matter, but I hope this provides you with the rule of thumb you requested. I encourage you to spend time studying the intricacies of these laws, will greatly enhance your fulfillment of Shabbos as well as provide tremendous insight into the profound wisdom of the Torah.

Sincerely,

Rabbi Yerachmiel Fried

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

More To Explore

Jewish Law & Thought

An Eye for an Eye

I recently attended a talk where the speaker explained the famous “an eye for an eye” verse in the Torah. As society has become less barbaric, the rabbis reinterpreted the verse to mean one pays the damages for the eye instead of taking out the eye of the perpetrator as it used to be done in the olden days. I have a big problem with the fact that the Torah originally had the punishment of taking out someone’s eye. What does it say for the Torah if it began as a barbaric set of laws and only later, rabbis try to smooth it out?

Jewish Law & Thought

Mourning After Kaddish

I have recently completed the year of mourning and kaddish for my father, and am left with a profound feeling of emptiness now that it’s finished. I know I can no longer say kaddish, but is there anything more that I can do or is that it?